Re: Expansion Discussion Reply #75 – November 12, 2017, 07:56:31 AM Previously it was one year removed, but this year it has changed (along with adding the Arbitration Rule) to the immediate year following the player surpassing his rookieosity. Quote Selected
Re: Expansion Discussion Reply #76 – November 12, 2017, 08:00:33 AM Quote from: thebuland – on November 12, 2017, 07:56:31 AMPreviously it was one year removed, but this year it has changed (along with adding the Arbitration Rule) to the immediate year following the player surpassing his rookieosity.Thought I remembered seeing that change. It's not reflected in the rule book yet though, so just wanted to confirm.Thanks Matt Quote Selected
Re: Expansion Discussion Reply #77 – November 12, 2017, 08:25:04 AM Matt is right. I will do my best to update the Rule book tonight. Should get some time alone (provided my daughter doesn’t start vomiting like Linda Blair for the third night in a row.) Quote Selected
Re: Expansion Discussion Reply #78 – November 15, 2017, 01:28:38 PM Are the expansion teams limited to 50M of spending during the free-agent period?I cannot recall if this was discussed, completed and I don't really want to look through five pages of comments to find it back. I'm not pointing fingers, but I see a whole lot of 250K players being selected. Quote Selected
Re: Expansion Discussion Reply #79 – November 15, 2017, 01:33:28 PM They are as are all teams. Quote Selected