Skip to main content
Topic: HAMMERS - SP Nathan Eovaldi - $4.75m/2027 (Read 7853 times) previous topic - next topic

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #15
Jason, thank you for your honesty. That's one of the hardest things to track for the CO, so I know they appreciate your sportsmanship, as do I.

I am trying to remember the reason for this rule. It seems like one that rarely comes into play (although maybe having it there means teams having a long-run plan to keep their max amount in a season to $50 million or less), and when teams do have more than $50 million, it isn't a lot over $50 million (I think I started at around $52 million). What is the thought process behind this rule?

It's a legacy rule from when we only had 3 year contracts and no arbitration.  It was designed around keeping teams honest and ensuring they participated in free agency.  But it makes a lot less sense nowadays.  Rod and I have already discussed adding it to the list for discussion (i.e. eliminating it for next year).
David
Phoenix Miners

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #16
As I recall, it was to discourage tanking.
Kyle - 2008, 2015, 2019 MSB Champion

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #17


I am trying to remember the reason for this rule. It seems like one that rarely comes into play (although maybe having it there means teams having a long-run plan to keep their max amount in a season to $50 million or less), and when teams do have more than $50 million, it isn't a lot over $50 million (I think I started at around $52 million). What is the thought process behind this rule?

It's a legacy rule from when we only had 3 year contracts and no arbitration.  It was designed around keeping teams honest and ensuring they participated in free agency.  But it makes a lot less sense nowadays.  Rod and I have already discussed adding it to the list for discussion (i.e. eliminating it for next year).

I can understand that a team might abuse free agency in those early days by lightly participating (aka, tanking) for a few years and then jumping in with a ton of salary cap space. I agree with arbitration; it goes a long way in keeping teams active (although I guess teams could always tank). With arbitration, it is easy for teams to build up a lot of salary cap space if they have a few superstars debut in the same year and start getting raises together. I think juggling the salary cap in the league nowadays is a lot more challenging than it was 15 years ago.
Jason
Ankeny ACLs

"I'm pissed off now, Jobu. Look, I go to you. I stick up for you. You no help me now. I say 'F#@& you Jobu', I do it myself."
-Pedro Cerrano, Major League

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #18


It's a legacy rule from when we only had 3 year contracts and no arbitration.  It was designed around keeping teams honest and ensuring they participated in free agency.  But it makes a lot less sense nowadays.  Rod and I have already discussed adding it to the list for discussion (i.e. eliminating it for next year).

I can understand that a team might abuse free agency in those early days by lightly participating (aka, tanking) for a few years and then jumping in with a ton of salary cap space. I agree with arbitration; it goes a long way in keeping teams active (although I guess teams could always tank). With arbitration, it is easy for teams to build up a lot of salary cap space if they have a few superstars debut in the same year and start getting raises together. I think juggling the salary cap in the league nowadays is a lot more challenging than it was 15 years ago.

Agreed with all of that.  Unless something changes, my suggestion in the off-season is that we scrap it.
David
Phoenix Miners

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #19
I agree. At a minimum something to discuss.
I just don’t see the need for it anymore.
Rod
Scurvy Dogs

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #20
$2.75 million ( I think 2.5 was the last bid)
auk
Bob Miller
The Great Auk

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #21
HGH bid $3.0M
HGH fka theOCD
Disproving the Pythagorean Theorem of Baseball, year after year...

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #22
$3.25 million

auk
Bob Miller
The Great Auk

 

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #23
HGH bid $3.5M
HGH fka theOCD
Disproving the Pythagorean Theorem of Baseball, year after year...

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #24
$3.75 million

auk
Bob Miller
The Great Auk

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #25
HGH bid $4M
HGH fka theOCD
Disproving the Pythagorean Theorem of Baseball, year after year...

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #26
$4.5 million

Auk
Bob Miller
The Great Auk

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #27
HGH bid $4.75M
HGH fka theOCD
Disproving the Pythagorean Theorem of Baseball, year after year...

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #28
Eovaldi will officially be our first silent auction of the year!

Current high bid belongs to the Hammers at $4.75M, but the Auk are still in this. However, anyone is welcome to continue bidding until 9PM CST if they want to be included in the silent auction.
Rod
Scurvy Dogs

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #29
Edit - 9PM PST, not CST
Rod
Scurvy Dogs