HAMMERS - SP Nathan Eovaldi

Topic: HAMMERS - SP Nathan Eovaldi - $4.75m/2027 (Read 7851 times) previous topic - next topic

HAMMERS - SP Nathan Eovaldi - $4.75m/2027

March 01, 2025, 04:40:50 AM

Please enter bids below:

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #1 – March 01, 2025, 08:31:55 AM

$250K

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #2 – March 01, 2025, 10:29:41 AM

HGH bid $350k

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #3 – March 01, 2025, 10:48:46 AM

$450K

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #4 – March 01, 2025, 01:35:26 PM

$650,000

auk

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #5 – March 01, 2025, 04:41:31 PM

$1.0M

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #6 – March 01, 2025, 08:55:05 PM

The ACLs bid $1.25 million on Nathan Eovaldi.

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #7 – March 02, 2025, 07:00:47 AM

HGH bid $1.5M

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #8 – March 02, 2025, 09:56:27 AM

I posted a bid on Eovaldi, but that bid is invalid since I can only spend $50 million on free agents this year, and this bid would put me over the limit on free agent spending (I'm under the overall salary cap, though). The high bid should still be $1.5 million from the Hammers posted at 10:01 AM ET.

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #9 – March 02, 2025, 11:22:58 AM

1.75M

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #10 – March 02, 2025, 01:19:36 PM

HGH bid $2M

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #11 – March 02, 2025, 09:21:16 PM

$2.25 million

auk

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #12 – March 03, 2025, 05:29:01 AM

HGH bid $2.5M

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #13 – March 03, 2025, 08:39:53 AM

Quote from: profjason – on March 02, 2025, 09:56:27 AM

I posted a bid on Eovaldi, but that bid is invalid since I can only spend $50 million on free agents this year, and this bid would put me over the limit on free agent spending (I'm under the overall salary cap, though). The high bid should still be $1.5 million from the Hammers posted at 10:01 AM ET.

Jason, thank you for your honesty. That's one of the hardest things to track for the CO, so I know they appreciate your sportsmanship, as do I.

Re: SP Nathan Eovaldi

Reply #14 – March 03, 2025, 08:45:55 AM

Quote from: Kyle – on March 03, 2025, 08:39:53 AM

Quote from: profjason – on March 02, 2025, 09:56:27 AM
I posted a bid on Eovaldi, but that bid is invalid since I can only spend $50 million on free agents this year, and this bid would put me over the limit on free agent spending (I'm under the overall salary cap, though). The high bid should still be $1.5 million from the Hammers posted at 10:01 AM ET.
Jason, thank you for your honesty. That's one of the hardest things to track for the CO, so I know they appreciate your sportsmanship, as do I.

I am trying to remember the reason for this rule. It seems like one that rarely comes into play (although maybe having it there means teams having a long-run plan to keep their max amount in a season to $50 million or less), and when teams do have more than $50 million, it isn't a lot over $50 million (I think I started at around $52 million). What is the thought process behind this rule?